Legal Opinion

Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1968No. 40238, 39754PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

In 1963, the petitioner, hereafter referred to as the Commissioner, instituted this action against Federal Old Line Insurance Company (a domestic mutual), hereafter referred to as the company, under the provisions of RCW 48.31.030, praying for an order to rehabilitate the company. Following an extensive hearing, such an order was entered on November 10, 1964. On appeal the order was affirmed. Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line Ins. Co. (Mutual), 69 Wn.2d 392, 418 P.2d 443 (1966).

The causes for the order of rehabilitation are stated fully in the trial court’s initial findings of fact and in some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Federal Old Line Life Insurance v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Foster v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Doyle v. Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Koken v. Legion InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Herrmann v. CissnaWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kreidler v. Cascade National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API