Legal Opinion
Herrmann v. Cissna
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1973No. 42479PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This action was commenced on May 29, 1969, by the Insurance Commissioner for the State of Washington, in his capacity as statutory rehabilitator of Federal Old Line Insurance Company (Mutual), a domestic mutual insurance company, under the authority of RCW 48.31.120(2). The respondents are the former officers and directors of the defunct insurance company.
In 1963, Lee I. Kueckelhan, then State Insurance Commissioner, petitioned the superior court for an order directing rehabilitation of the company under the provisions of RCW 48.13.080. The petition was resisted by the company, which was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Maybury v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Johnson v. RothsteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Dunning v. PaccerelliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Trimble v. American Savings Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State v. LG Electronics, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.