In re Syngenta Mass Tort Actions
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
David R. Herndon, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Syngenta’s motion to' dismiss, plaintiffs’ First Consolidated Amended Complaint [Doc. 59] for lack' of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), and failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), [Doc. 115]. Plaintiffs1 oppose the motion [Doc. 133]. Based on the following, the Court GRANTS in part Syngenta’s motion to dismiss and DENIES in part'Syngenta’s motion to dismiss and request for oral argument.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Introduction
In March 2016, Roland Poletti, et al.1…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Dicamba Herbicides Litig.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
- Mussat v. Enclarity, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Baity v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
- Florence Mussat, M.D. S.C. v. Relx Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Sweet v. BJC Health SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.