Legal Opinion
People v. Hirschbein
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 14, 1936No. Crim. 2893PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.
The defendant was convicted on fifteen separate counts of grand theft. On appeal the judgments were affirmed. (People v. Hirschbein, 12 Cal. App. (2d) 447 [55 Pac. (2d) 516].) Thereafter in the trial court the defendant made a motion to have the several sentences ordered to run concurrently in place and instead of consecutively, and he also made a motion to correct the judgments to that effect. These motions were both denied and this appeal is taken from the orders denying the motions.
The judgment upon the first count sentenced the defendant to be imprisoned “for the term prescribed by law”.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. PerelesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
- People v. LovelessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- In Re SteigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. HirschbeinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Long v. StanleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- In Re KindredCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. PalacioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. McCrackenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945