Legal Opinion
People v. Palacio
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 14, 1948No. Crim. 593PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The defendants were jointly charged with a violation of section 265 of the Penal Code in that on February 27, 1948, they had unlawfully taken the complaining witness against her will and had by force, menace and duress compelled her to be defiled. In a second count they were charged, under subdivision 4 of section 261, with raping the same girl.
About 10 p. m. on February 28, 1948, the complaining witness, with her boy friend, was in an automobile which was parked on a country road about 3 miles from Tulare. The car was a convertible with a canvas top. The five defendants, in another car,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. AlboriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. HirschbeinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. FinkelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961