Legal Opinion

Ford v. Carballo

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 22, 1978No. 77-1723PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN SHARP, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a determination by the Interstate Commerce Commission (the “Commission”) that the Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company (“IHB”) may not assess additional charges for the empty movement of privately-owned freight cars for ordinary repairs once they have entered *396the national car fleet and must participate in an excess empty mileage “equalization” rule published by the nation’s railroads. It was initiated by a petition for judicial review filed with this Court by IHB on July 5, 1977.

The Commission’s determination was made in a decision served on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Lawson Milk Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Isis Plumbing & Heating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Sales v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Francis Larkin and Francis BolducCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Wiggins v. County of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API