Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation, a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Armour and Company, and Armour and Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Louis Speetor with directions to prepare and file his opinion on the issues of plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment under the order of reference and Rule 166(c). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on June 25, 1970, wherein such facts as are necessary to the opinion are set forth. Defendant filed a request for review by the court and the case has been submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel and the briefs of the…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Law v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- National Eastern Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973