Legal Opinion

Krenger v. Palmer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1966No. 5789Published

1Opinion of the CourtHttnsicker, J.

In this appeal on questions of law, complaint is made that the verdict rendered by the unanimous vote of the jury is inadequate. We have examined the bill of exceptions with particular reference to that assignment of error and the claimed error in allowing an examining surgeon to give his opinion without the use of a hypothetical question.

The low verdict given by the jury is due to the fact that the jurors did not accept the story of the plaintiff, Mrs. Krenger (appellant herein), relating to the extent of her injuries resulting from an automobile accident, nor the testimony given by her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marshall v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. O'Donnell v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Christastie v. Elmira Water, Light & RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. John Thornton, Otis Sumler, Charlie Harris, Roland Owens and H. Lee Kanter, Committee for York Bryant v. Victory Carriers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  5. DiMarzo v. Columbus Transit Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API