Legal Opinion

Christastie v. Elmira Water, Light & Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

The action was brought to recover for the pecuniary loss of the plaintiff resulting from personal injuries inflicted on his wife in a collision between two of the defendant’s street cars. The only questions raised upon this appeal are with reference to alleged errors in ruling by the justice presiding.

One question was challenged by the appellant as an improper hypothetical question as assuming facts not before the jury. The question was propounded by counsel for the plaintiff to Dr. Cole-grove who had testified to a personal examination of the plaintiff when called in consultation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. People v. . YoungsNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of McLaughlin v. Curtis-Quillen Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Claim of Bergman v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Claim of Bergman v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  4. Krenger v. PalmerOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. People v. MathiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API