Legal Opinion

Elysium Institute, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1991No. B031797PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*417Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

—Elysium Institute, Inc., and Churchill Land Corporation (Elysium) appeal from a judgment denying their petition for writ of mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) wherein Elysium (1) challenged the April 1, 1986, decision of the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors denying Elysium’s application for nonconforming use permit and structure review to continue operation of a nudist camp and (2) challenged the constitutionality of Los Angeles County Zoning Ordinance No. 10,366 pertaining to nudist camps.

Factual and Procedural Background

The following factual and procedural…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. College Area Renters & Landlord Ass'n v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Coalition Advocating Legal Housing Options v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Elysium Institute, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Levin Richmond Terminal Corporation v. City of RichmondDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API