Legal Opinion

Raftery v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Ry.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1925No. Appeal, 79PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephabt,

Deceased was killed while employed as a brakeman on a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce. His widow recovered in the court below. The substantive rights between the parties, arising from relations as hére indicated, are governed by the federal rules under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, though the case is tried in the state court: Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. v. Ferebee, 238 U. S. 269; New Orleans & Northeastern R. R. Co. v. Harris, 247 U. S. 367, 371, and cases cited. In such action plaintiff must establish negligence as an affirmative fact,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Muslera v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Natvig v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Neal v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Ginocchietti v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API