Legal Opinion

K.Z. v. P.M.

New York City Family Court

Decided August 2, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Andrew P. Bivona, J.

*573This is an application by the respondent to compel discovery in a family offense proceeding. The motion was brought on by way of notice of motion to allow interrogatories and production of documents returnable in this court on July 8, 2010. On June 30, 2010, petitioner’s counsel filed an affirmation in opposition. On the return date no one appeared and the motion was marked fully submitted for decision.

The application is denied. As set forth in Family Court Act § 165, the provisions of the Civil Practice Law and Rules apply where the method of procedure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Sara R. v. SugarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Lebedeff v. LebedeffNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Kunz v. KunzNew York City Family Court · 1983
  4. AOS v. RMNew York City Family Court · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Appointment of a Guardian of the Person of E.T.N.New York City Family Court · 2013
  2. Carlos L. v. Sandy C.New York City Family Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API