Legal Opinion

Kunz v. Kunz

New York City Family Court

Decided May 6, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ralph Diamond, J.

This is a motion by the respondent in a family offense petition for an examination before trial of the petitioner. This appears to be one of first impression.

Subdivision (a) of section 165 of the Family Court Act provides that the disclosure article of the CPLR is generally applicable to Family Court proceedings “to the extent that they are appropriate to the proceedings involved.”

Various disclosure devices under the CPLR have been permitted in the Family Court in numerous proceedings under the Family Court Act. However, no case has been reported in which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Sara R. v. SugarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. KoertgeNassau County District Court · 1998
  2. Eileen W. v. Mario A.New York City Family Court · 1996
  3. In re Vanessa R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. In re Malik O.New York City Family Court · 1993
  5. K.Z. v. P.M.New York City Family Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API