Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Samaritan Hospital
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert A. Harlem, J.
The plaintiffs move in this medical malpractice action to vacate portions of the report of the panel.
A medical malpractice panel was designated and convened pursuant to section 148-a of the Judiciary Law. Following presentation of all materials which counsel for the respective parties offered, a report was sent forth .finding that the Samaritan Hospital, Susan Hart and Cyril Cameron departed from the standard of care which should have been afforded to the plaintiff’s intestate, and further reported that the departure permitted a continuation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Comstock v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Kletnieks v. Brookhaven Memorial Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Bryant v. University of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Ltd., Inc. v. McCrory Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Wolfe v. Samaritan HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984