Interiors Contracting, Inc. v. Smith, Halander & Smith Associates
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Presiding Judge:
Coonradt Construction Company (Coon-radt) appeals from a judgment dismissing its mechanics’ hen as untimely filed and thus invahd. We affirm.
FACTS
This case is before us a second time. Detailed facts pertinent to the initial dispute can be found in Interiors Contracting, Inc. v. Smith, Hollander & Smith Associates, 827 P.2d 963, 965 (Utah App.1992) (hereinafter “Interiors I”). We recite only the facts pertinent to the issues raised in this second appeal. Coonradt’s original action seeking to foreclose its August 19, 1987 mechanics’ hen was tried without a jury…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Brinkerhoff v. ForsythUtah Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.