Legal Opinion

Interiors Contracting, Inc. v. Smith, Halander & Smith Associates

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 31, 1994No. 930414-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge:

Coonradt Construction Company (Coon-radt) appeals from a judgment dismissing its mechanics’ hen as untimely filed and thus invahd. We affirm.

FACTS

This case is before us a second time. Detailed facts pertinent to the initial dispute can be found in Interiors Contracting, Inc. v. Smith, Hollander & Smith Associates, 827 P.2d 963, 965 (Utah App.1992) (hereinafter “Interiors I”). We recite only the facts pertinent to the issues raised in this second appeal. Coonradt’s original action seeking to foreclose its August 19, 1987 mechanics’ hen was tried without a jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Brinkerhoff v. ForsythUtah Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API