Legal Opinion

Jerry William Tyler v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1966No. 8658PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal is from a denial of appellant’s Section 2255 motion, which attacked a judgment and sentence after a jury verdict of guilty.

In the trial court, Tyler contended only that his constitutional right to a fair trial had been violated because the trial judge, at the request of the jury after submission of the case, permitted the testimony of a government witness to be read back to the jury. The court below dismissed the Section 2255 motion, without a hearing, upon the pleadings, files and records in the case. We agree with this disposition of the motion.

It was within the sound discretion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Independent Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Julius Rosenberg and Ethel Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Audilio Carrillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. James Marvin Easley and Joe A. Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. William De PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. John Thomas Price, William Hollis PriceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. A. Henry TagerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  4. Price v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Settle v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API