Legal Opinion

James Marvin Easley and Joe A. Alexander v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1958No. 16978_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The Government charged the appellants with violating the Federal Liquor Law, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5008(b) (1), 5174, 5606. The appellants were convicted and appeal. They claim they were on a hog-hunting errand and had nothing to do with the illegal still or its product, and assert the evidence was insufficient to convict. The district court, in ruling upon motions for acquittal and for new trial, held the evidence sufficient to go to the jury and to sustain a conviction. We conclude these holdings were correct.

The witnesses were placed under the rule and admonished not to discuss the case with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Independent Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Julius Rosenberg and Ethel Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. United States v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Julian W. Sears v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Mason Braswell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Billy Leu Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. EastwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Mary McKee v. McDonnell Douglas Technical Services Co., Inc., a Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API