Legal Opinion
United States v. William De Palma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 2, 1969No. 23297PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:. Appellant, on conflicting evidence, was convicted by a jury of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (d). In the course of the bank robbery, appellant was alleged to have “assaulted and put in jeopardy the life of teller Ernestine Cazares by the use of a pistol, a dangerous weapon and device.” Because of certain matters urged in defense, including the defense of the insufficiency of the evidence to convict, we turn to the evidence.
The teller, Ernestine Cazares, positively identified the defendant in court (R.T. 51-52) as the man who had approached her teller’s window on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Raymond John Wagner, Anthony Joseph Cambiano and Donald Vandergrift v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Billy Leu Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Preston T. Patterson, United States of America v. Benjamin DemagistrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Andre Willis King, United States of America v. Fred Neil PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.