Legal Opinion
Northern Kare Facilities/Kingdom Kare, LLC v. Benefirst, LLC
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 1, 2004No. CIV.A.03-12112-JLTPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Northern Kare Facilities/Kingdom Kare, LLC (“Northern Kare”) sponsored a group health care benefit plan (the “ERISA plan”), and funded it with a bank account. 1 Northern Kare contracted with Defendants Intermediary Insurance Service Inc. (“Intermediary”) and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company (“MEGA Life”) to provide stop-loss insurance coverage. Stop-loss insurance protects the policyholder against excessive employee claims by reimbursing the policyholder for a portion of plan benefits that exceeds designated amounts. 2 Under this stop-loss…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of Louisiana v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare Inc. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Ag Equipment Co. v. Aig Life Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
- Bank of Louisiana v. Aetna US Healthcare Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Bank of Louisiana v. Aetna US Healthcare Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Bank of Louisiana v. Aetna US HlthcareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006