Legal Opinion

Camilla Cotton Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1918No. 8719PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action for damages; from Mitchell superior court — Judge Cox. December 29, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. Where, in an action for a personal injury, one of the elements of damages alleged was decrease of the plaintiff’s earning capacity, and he testified that for three years preceding the injury he had satisfactorily served the defendant as machinist, it was not error to allow him to testify further “as to what the usual and customary wages of an expert machinist in this community at that kind of business are.”

2. A master owes to each servant the duty to exercise ordinary care in ' the selection of other servants engaged in the same enterprise, and not to retain them after knowledge of their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Rosenstiel v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Palacine Oil Co. v. PhilpotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Windsor v. Chanticleer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Carmichael v. SilversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Pope v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API