Legal Opinion

Pope v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1953No. 34677PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSxjtton, C. J.

Code § 105-108 provides as follows: “Every person shall be liable for torts committed by . . . his servant, by his command or in the prosecution and within the scope of his business, whether the same shall be by negligence or voluntary.” As construed in Frazier v. Southern Ry. Co., 200 Ga. 590, 593 (37 S. E. 2d 774), “The word ‘voluntary’ in § 105-108 will cover any or all motives or purposes of the wrongdoer,, acting in the scope of his employment, which are not covered by ‘acts of negligence.’ The true test is not whether the tort was committed by reason of anger, malice, or ill will, but…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Henderson v. Nolting First Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Savannah Electric Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Renfroe v. FouchéCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hines v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. McCranie v. Langdale Ford Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Lucas v. Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. GEORGIA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. TRIPLE" C" RECREATION ASSOCIATION v. CashCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API