Finstuen v. Edmondson
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CAUTHRON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants filed a Response and a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs filed a response to Defendants’ motion and these matters are now at issue. 1
Plaintiffs brought the present action challenging the validity of a 2004 amendment (Amendment) to 10 Okla. Stat. § 7502-1.4(A), a part of Oklahoma’s adoption code. That statute states:
The courts of this state shall recognize a decree, judgment, or final order creating the relationship of parent and child by adoption, issued by…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Finstuen v. CrutcherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Finstuen v. CrutcherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007