Legal Opinion

Finstuen v. Edmondson

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 2006No. CIV-04-1152-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CAUTHRON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants filed a Response and a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs filed a response to Defendants’ motion and these matters are now at issue. 1

Plaintiffs brought the present action challenging the validity of a 2004 amendment (Amendment) to 10 Okla. Stat. § 7502-1.4(A), a part of Oklahoma’s adoption code. That statute states:

The courts of this state shall recognize a decree, judgment, or final order creating the relationship of parent and child by adoption, issued by…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finstuen v. CrutcherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Finstuen v. CrutcherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API