Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1960No. 9839PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of each plaintiff for individual claims alleged to be due each of them under a contract of group insurance. The contract covered hospital and medical expense incurred by those insured.

The contract was originally drafted on May 12, 1952, and was made effective from May 1, 1952, until May 1, 1953.

It contained this clause: “In event the number of insureds hereunder becomes less than twenty-five, the Association shall decline to renew this policy at the expiration of the current insurance year. If the number of Insureds hereunder becomes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Poch v. Equit. L. Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Smith v. Kroeger, Supt.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Keane v. AETNA LIFE INS. CO., HARTFORD, CONN.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Dixie Fire Insurance v. American Confectionery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herbert E. Martz v. Union Labor Life Insurance Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Teesdale v. Anschutz Drilling CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Crowley v. Lafayette Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Yovish v. United Services Automobile Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rosen v. RozanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API