Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kroeger, Supt.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1941No. 28607PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

There is but one question raised by the record in this case, i. e., did the trial court have the power to make an allowance of fees to plaintiff’s attorneys payable out of the fund recovered? The answer to this question will depend upon whether or not the instant case was a class suit, and if a class suit, was the action taken within the powers of a court of equity?

Section 11257, General Code, provides: “When the question is one of common or general interest of many persons, or the parties are very numerous, and [it] is impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haggerty v. Squire, Supt.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Santos v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Commissioner of Insurance v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. State ex rel. Montrie Nursing Home, Inc. v. CreasyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hoeppner v. Jess Howard Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Rocca v. WilkeOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API