Jean-Laurent v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ANNUNZIATA, Judge.
The appellant, Philip Sam Jean-Laurent, was convicted of possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. Jean-Laurent contends on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. He alleges that the police violated his Fourth Amendment rights by removing his luggage from a bus and searching those bags without his consent and that any evidence discovered as a result of this unlawful seizure and search should have been suppressed. Because we find that Jean-Laurent did not consent to the seizure and subsequent search of his bags, we reverse…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GrimsteadCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sykes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Royal v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Hunt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Erie Lawrence v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.