Legal Opinion

Sykes v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 27, 2001No. 2838001PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT P. FRANK, Judge.

Bruce Lamarr Sykes (appellant) was convicted after a bench trial of possession of heroin, in violation of Code § 18.2-250. On appeal, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he was detained without reasonable suspicion or probable cause. He argues, therefore, the search incident to arrest was illegal. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the conviction.

I. BACKGROUND

Several City of Portsmouth police officers, members of the tactical response unit, were on routine patrol in two or three unmarked vehicles on the night of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barkley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  2. Arrington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  3. Schmitt v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  4. Commonwealth of Virginia v. Tyler Cannon SpainCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. Howard Lamont JacksonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API