Legal Opinion
Diop v. Ice/Homeland Security
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 1, 2011No. 10-1113PublishedCited by 264 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
A 1996 law requires that the Executive Branch take into custody any person who is removable from this country because he has committed, among other things, a crime involving moral turpitude or a crime involving a controlled substance. See Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub.L. No. 104-208, § 303, 110 Stat. 3009-585-86 (1996) (codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c)). Detention under this authority is mandatory, does not provide for the possibility of release on bond, and does not require that the Executive…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by264 opinions
- Jose German Santos v. Warden Pike County CorrectionaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Igor Borbot v. Warden Hudson County CorrectioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Jose Chavez-Alvarez v. Warden York County PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Banda v. McAleenanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.