Sparman v. Edwards
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Respondent appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gleeson, J.) granting a writ of habeas corpus to petitioner after determining that petitioner’s counsel at his state trial had been constitutionally ineffective. We affirm the judgment of the district court substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Gleeson in his Memorandum and Order, Sparman v. Edwards, 1997 WL 878324, -F.Supp. - (E.D.N.Y.1997).
We note in passing that Judge Gleeson held an evidentiary hearing at which petitioner’s trial counsel, who was then (and now) charged with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States of America, (Docket Nos. 83-1204, 83-1205) v. Charles O. Dukes, and Charles O. Dukes, (Docket No. 83-2185) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Sparman v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
3Cited by28 opinions
- Louis Eze v. Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Charles C. Greiner v. Ronald WellsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Zolton WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Jian Yun Zheng v. United States Department of Justice, John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.