Legal Opinion
Kim v. Harte Hanks, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 4, 2019No. 1:19-cv-01920Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DONG CHUL KIM, Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 1920 (KPF) -v.- HARTE HANKS, INC., HARTE-HANKS OPINION AND ORDER DIRECT, INC., HARTE-HANKS STRATEGIC MARKETING, INC., and NSO, INC., Defendants. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: Plaintiff Dong Chul Kim brings this suit against Defendants Harte Hanks, Inc., Harte-Hanks Direct, Inc., Harte-Hanks Strategic Marketing, Inc., and NSO, Inc., all of whom he alleges operated as a single entity that jointly employed him. Plaintiff, who is a native Korean, alleges that he was treated differently from his…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.