Legal Opinion

Wilson v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1996No. Nos. 94-3837, 94-3856, 94-3861 and 94-3863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, all of whom are former employees of defendant Matlack, Inc., filed suit on November 18,1991, against the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America; Local 507 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters; Local 92 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters; Matlack, Inc.; and Casol Leasing, Inc., alleging that Mat-lack breached its collective bargaining agreement with Local 92 and that Local 92 breached its duty of fair representation to the plaintiffs. Prior to trial, the district court dismissed…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. International Brotherhood Of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Cotter v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API