Legal Opinion

Roberson Lumber Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 30, 1982No. 514-81CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In August 1981, the plaintiff filed its petition under Rule 36 and, in September, filed the required motion for production of documents. Ct. Cl. R. 36. The defendant has moved to dismiss on the grounds that the plaintiffs petition is not a proper Rule 36 petition and that, under 28 U.S.C. §1500 (1976), the court lacks jurisdiction because of a pending suit in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. We agree that the petition is improper under Rule 36. We do not dismiss it, however, but treat it instead as a Rule 35 petition. We defer consideration of the section 1500 issue.

I

I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Greenway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Hannington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Maguire Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  5. Charley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roberson Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API