Legal Opinion

Roberson Lumber Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 23, 1984No. 514-81CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SETO, Judge:

In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover its bid preparation costs incurred in competing for two housing contracts in Kansas. Plaintiff asserts that the bids were solicited by the Housing Authority of the Prairie Band of the Potawatomi Tribe of Indians in conjunction with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the provisions of the Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1401 et seq.). Plaintiff alleges that the arbitrary and capricious acts of HUD in assessing plaintiff’s bid resulted in an award of the contracts…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernaugh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Houser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API