Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 31, 1980No. CM 438569PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’DONNELL, Judge:

At his trial in the Federal Republic of Germany, the appellant was represented by Samuel Cohen, a civilian attorney, in addition to his regularly detailed military counsel. Mr. Cohen stated for the record that he was the chief counsel and in fact acted in that capacity throughout the trial proceedings. Approximately two months after trial, a copy of the staff judge advocate review and an authenticated copy of the record of trial were received by the military defense counsel for the review in accordance with United States v. Goode, 1 M.J. 3 (C.M.A.1975).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. JeanbaptisteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ClarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API