Legal Opinion
Arrow Coach Lines v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 25, 1950No. 9904PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Justice.
This controversy is between two insurance companies, each of which was the insurer of a different bus company. Appellee Pennsylvania Casualty Company was the insurer of Creamer .Coaches, and appellant Highway Insurance Underwriters- was the insurer of Arrow Coaoh Lines.
Other parties are present but since they are in no way affected by the judgment and *884make no complaint they will not be further noticed.
The subject-matter of the suit is a number of claims which arose from accidents occurring on the Creamer Coach routes but subsequent to the execution of a contract of sale…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sly v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Federal Surety Co. v. JettonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. BendyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- American Employers' Ins. Co. v. HookfinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. De MartiniCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Arrow Coach Lines v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950