Legal Opinion

Broxton v. Siegelman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 18, 2003No. 1020192PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Bob Riley succeeded Don Siegelman as Governor. Rule 43(b), Ala.R.App.P., provides that when an officeholder leaves office, the successor is automatically substituted.

This taxpayer lawsuit challenges the expenditure of funds for a proposed alteration of the grounds and streets in front of the state capitol. This case presents three issues: whether the plaintiff, Roger Broxton, presented substantial evidence indicating that state moneys were being used in the proposed alteration, thereby authorizing him, as a state taxpayer, to sue; whether payments made using state funds, but which are then…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Riley v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Guy v. B.C. Rogers Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
  4. Ingle v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  5. Working v. Jefferson County Election CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API