Legal Opinion

Riley v. Pate

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 3, 2008No. 1071003PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*837WOODALL, Justice.

Governor Bob Riley, State Treasurer Kay Ivey, Finance Director James Allen Main, and Comptroller Robert L. Childree (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the officials”) appeal from a preliminary injunction entered against them in an action filed by Luther S. Pate IV. The officials argue, in pertinent part, that Pate does not have standing to maintain the action. We agree. Consequently, we vacate the preliminary injunction, dismiss the action, and dismiss this appeal.

I. Factual Background

This dispute arose following this Court’s decision in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Alabama…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Zeigler v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. ALA. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCESSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Town of Cedar Bluff v. Citizens Caring for ChildrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans ServicingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  2. Blevins v. Hillwood Office Center Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Poiroux v. RichSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. CIT Communication Finance Corp. v. McFadden, Lyon & Rouse, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Miller v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API