Legal Opinion

People v. Bussel

California Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2002No. BR 41234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 159 (2002)

97 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Daniel J. BUSSEL, Defendant and Appellant.

No. BR 41234.

Appellate Division, Superior Court, Los Angeles County.

January 17, 2002.

Ezekiel P. Perlo, Encino, and Edward J. Horowitz, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

David A. Sklansky and John T. Philipsborn, San Francisco, for California Attorneys for Criminal Justice as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant

Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Debbie Lew, Assistant City Attorney, and Candice I. Horikawa, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gomez-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Hoover v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. United States v. Gomez-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. In re Y.G. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. United States v. Gomez-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API