People v. Barker
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. L. Foster Young, Wickliffe Matthews, and Richard P. Henshall, for Appellant. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, A. A. Moore, Jr., Deputy Attorney-General, and Lewis F. Byington, District Attorney, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Defendant has been convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape, and appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. Many alleged errors are relied upon to secure a reversal of the judgment and a new trial, but we find no merit in the great majority of them, for in almost every case the rulings of the court were absolutely correct, and where not technically correct the errors committed were of a most trivial and unsubstantial character.
It is insisted that the information is fatally defective, and that a motion in arrest of judgment should have been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. KeithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. AkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.