Ford v. Marsden

A. Y. Marsden sued H. D. Ford and A. O. Abbott upon a promissory note for the sum of $253.35, with interest and attorney’s fees. It appears that a writ of attachment was issued, executed, and the property afterwards re-plevied by the defendants. There was a motion to quash the attachment and the officer’s return upon same. The attachment was sought to be quashed, because it was claimed the attachment bond had not been approved by the clerk at the time the writ was issued. The return was sought to be quashed because it failed to show that the officer had made an estimate of the value of the…