Griffith v. Robinson
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Nacogdoches. Tried below before the Hon. Archibald W. 0. Hicks. The facts arc stated in the Opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This is an action, brought by appellant against appellee, upon promissory notes, in which an attachment was issued. Appellee moved to quash the attachment, because, *2211st. The petition was not sworn to. 2nd. There was no sufficient bond. 3rd. There was no sufficient affidavit ; and 4th. “ Because the bond was never approved by the Clerk who took the same, as the Statute requires.”
The Court below sustained the exceptions and quashed the attachment; and judgment having been rendered on the notes, the cause is brought here to revise the action of the Court upon the motion. The only ground now…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hutton v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1870
- West v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
- Schulz v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Ford v. MarsdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Ward v. Dallas Texas National Title Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.