Payne v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance Co. of New York
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.
The parties to this appeal do not seem to agree upon the nature of the suit in' which the judgment was rendered and from which the appeal was taken. In order to properly decide this preliminary matter, it may be well to state that plaintiffs’ theory is that it is not merely a suit for the loss sustained by reaspn of the partial destruction, by fire of a house insured by defendant in a policy issued by it, but also for damages for defendant’s breach of its obligation to repair the .house after its partial destruction by. fire, contained' in or created’ by the policy. Defendant; however,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Solomon v. Moberly Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Still v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Anthony v. German American InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Fire Ass'n v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. GarfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schultz v. Queen Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Samuels v. Illinois Fire Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Meyer v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Fleetwood v. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
- Leigh v. Western Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.