Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Queen Insurance Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1965No. 31637PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a $3,525 judgment for plaintiffs on two fire and windstorm insurance policies. The case now presents only the appeal of the defendants-insurers. (Initially, the plaintiffs appealed from the trial court’s denial of their claim for penalties for vexatious delay, but we dismissed that appeal, No. 31,636, for plaintiffs’ failure to file a brief. Civil Rules 83.06 and 83.09, V.A.M.R.)

The issues raised here concern plaintiffs’ failure to make a formal proof of loss, their duty to comply with conditions of the poli cy as to inspection and appraisal, and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Loewenstein v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. James v. United States Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Mrazek v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Greer v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Watters v. Travel Guard InternationalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Reese v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Katz Drug Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. ACF Produce, Inc. v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API