Legal Opinion

Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. Garfield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

This is an action of covenant upon a policy of insurance, brought by the insured against the company. After the destruction of the property by fire, a notice to re-build was given, according to a clause contained in the policy.

The objections to the form of the action and the right of the plaintiff to sue, can not be availed of here. These were raised by demurrer in the court below, as the declaration sets forth at length the policy and the notice to re-build. This having been overruled, special pleas were filed. The appellant should have abided by his demurrer if he desired to present the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gage v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., of Hartford, Conn.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Michigan Shingle Co. v. State Investment & InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Shunick v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  4. Pomeroy v. Rocky Mountain Ins. & Sav. Inst.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  5. First Texas State Ins. Co. v. CapeirsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API