Consolidated Water Power & Paper Co. v. Spartan Aircraft Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the responsibility of a seller to a buyer either for breach of warranty or a statutory liability in the nature of an action for deceit. The seller won in the trial court and the buyer appeals to us on the basis that tlie conclusion reached by the learned Trial Judge is clearly erroneous under Rule 52(a). 1
The case is in federal court because of diversity only. Plaintiff seller is a Wisconsin corporation with its principal place of business in that state. The defendant buyer is a Delaware corporation and its principal place of business is in Oklahoma.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wood & Co. v. Val Blatz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Wallace v. L. D. Clark & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- In Re Marriage of AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Byce v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Textile Biocides Inc. v. Avecia Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.