Legal Opinion
In Re Settlement of Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 26, 1933No. Nos. 29,297, 29,300PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 248 N.W. 710. Pine county appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial in case No. 29,300 and from a judgment in case No. 29,297.
Kanabec and Pine counties are each operating under the county system of administering relief to the poor. One F.H. Johnson and his family moved to Pine county on March 31, 1929, and there remained until April 21, 1930, when they moved to Kanabec county, wherein they have resided ever since. On March 30, 1931, Johnson was a poor person to whom Kanabec county gave temporary relief in the sum of $20. On April 29, 1931, proceedings were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Town of Smiley v. Village of St. HilaireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- City of Willmar v. County of KandiyohiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Village of Grove City v. Township of ManannahSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- County of Steele v. County of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Lovell v. SeebackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Settlement of VenteicherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- City of Detroit Lakes v. Village of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- County of Mille Lacs v. Town of LeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- City of Minneapolis v. Village of HanoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- In Re Settlement of SchendelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.