Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2011No. 05-50170Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Judges SILVERMAN, GOULD and CALLAHAN:

I agree with and join Parts I-IV of the majority opinion explaining why we should reverse our prior ruling in Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). However, I respectfully dissent from the balance of the opinion applying the modified categorical approach to the facts of this case.

Although the majority opinion overrules Navarro-Lopez’s rule regarding our inability to apply the modified categorical approach when a state statute is missing an element of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API