United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Judges SILVERMAN, GOULD and CALLAHAN:
I agree with and join Parts I-IV of the majority opinion explaining why we should reverse our prior ruling in Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). However, I respectfully dissent from the balance of the opinion applying the modified categorical approach to the facts of this case.
Although the majority opinion overrules Navarro-Lopez’s rule regarding our inability to apply the modified categorical approach when a state statute is missing an element of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.