In Re Stanworth
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
— May a defendant who has been sentenced to a “life” imprisonment under the Indeterminate Sentence Law (ISL) (former Pen. Code, § 1168, repealed eff. Jan. 1, 1977) be entitled to parole release consideration under both ISL and the administrative guidelines which were in effect at the time he was sentenced and also under the Uniform Determinate Sentencing Act of 1976 (DSL) (Pen. Code, § 1170 et seq.) and its implementing regulations? Concluding that ex post facto principles require that his right to parole be considered under both laws, we will affirm the trial court’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. PearsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.