Legal Opinion

In Re Jackson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1985No. Crim. 24381PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Does the 1982 amendment to Penal Code section 3041.5, 1 which empowers the Board of Prison Terms to schedule parole suitability hearings biennially instead of annually, violate the ex post facto clauses of the state and federal Constitutions when applied to an inmate who committed his or her offense before its effective date?

I

Respondent, Lawrence Jackson, was convicted of first degree murder for a killing which occurred in September of 1961. He was sentenced to death. Following two penalty retrials, each resulting in a death sentence, respondent’s sentence was ultimately…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. C.T. Akins, Jay M. Fate, Michael Schroeder v. Wayne Snow, Jr., Chairman State Board of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API