Legal Opinion
Page v. Donovan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1984No. Nos. 83-7122, 83-7128PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners seek review and reversal of an administrative decision holding them ineligible to receive income replacement benefits under Title II of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978, Pub.L. 95-250, 92 Stat. 163, 172-182.
In 1981 petitioners were both laid off from jobs in the northern California redwood industry. Papageorge had been green end foreman and later panel foreman in a plywood plant. As green end foreman, Pa-pageorge supervised 20 or so employees. Page was general foreman of the night shift in the same plywood plant. He supervised three foremen…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Getty Oil Co. v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Emma L. David v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Elaine S. Stickelman v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Action, Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Turner v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. HigginsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.