Legal Opinion

Tidball v. Orkin Exterminating Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 26, 1991No. 89-1462PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Tidball and his wife, Velma Jean, along with their son, John Paul, sued Orkin Exterminating Company, alleging that when they contracted with Orkin to treat their home for termites, Orkin told the Tidballs, in response to their specific inquiry, that it would not use a particular chemical, chlordane. The Tidballs further alleged, however, that chlordane was indeed used, and that, as a result, each of them suffered various physical ailments. The Tidballs, in their complaint, asserted breach of contract, fraud, and negligence claims against Orkin. Following a jury trial, the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hagler v. GillilandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. State Realty Co. v. LigonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Ravi v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Perry v. Seaboard Coast Line RR Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chatham v. CSX Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Ex Parte GurganusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. McKelvy v. DarnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Pulley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Sweeney v. CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API